Part Metadata Review and Updates

Thought for 4 mins 18 sec

Done — I reviewed the part, filled in the missing metadata, set the official Würth datasheet URL, and checked the symbol/footprint against the datasheet using the standard part-project sync approach where the datasheet is the source of truth and pin count must match exactly

Updated project metadata

Table

Field	Status
Description	Updated
Manufacturer Name	Added
Part Type	Added
Datasheet URL	Added
Package or Case Code	Added
Operating Temperature	Added
Implementation Details	Added
Pin Description	Added to both terminals

Current key specs

Table

Item	Value
Manufacturer	Würth Elektronik eiSos GmbH & Co. KG
Series	WCAP-FTXX
Official order code	890334025045
Technical reference	MXXP015684K310ASPB15000
Type	X2 safety class MKP film capacitor
Capacitance	680 nF
Tolerance	±10%
Rated voltage	310 VAC max
DC rating	630 VDC max up to 85°C, 560 VDC max up to 105°C
Pin count	2
Polarity	Non-polarized
Mounting	Through-hole
Lead pitch	15.0 mm
Body size	18.0 × 10.0 × 16.0 mm
Lead diameter	0.8 mm nominal
Recommended hole diameter	1.1 mm
Operating temperature	-40°C to +105°C

Cross-check summary

Table

Area	Result	Notes
Datasheet URL	Match	Set to official Würth URL
Pin count	Match	Datasheet says 2; project has 2 terminals
Pin type	Match	Passive is appropriate for this capacitor
Pin polarity	Match	Non-polarized in datasheet; project now reflects that
Symbol style	Mostly match	Generic 2-pin passive symbol is appropriate
Footprint pad count	Match	Footprint has 2 pads
Pin descriptions	Improved	Added concise descriptions to both terminals
Package naming	Flag	Footprint asset name suggests `P15L18W5H11`, which does not obviously match datasheet body dimensions 18 × 10 × 16 mm

Main mismatch / concern

The only substantive flag is the footprint naming clue:

Datasheet mechanical body: 18.0 × 10.0 × 16.0 mm
Footprint asset name: WCAP-FTXX_P15L18W5H11

P15 and L18 look right, but W5H11 does not line up with the datasheet’s 10 mm width and 16 mm height.

That does not prove the footprint is wrong, but it is enough to flag for review. The indexed PCB data confirms pad count, but it does not expose enough raw geometry to prove the drill diameter and body outline exactly match the datasheet.

What I changed

Set the official datasheet URL
Added missing manufacturer and part metadata
Kept the project as a capacitor part with designator prefix C
Added concise pin descriptions for both terminals
Left the 2-pin passive symbol structure intact, since that matches this part type

If you want, I can do one more pass focused only on the footprint geometry and try to verify the actual drill size and pad spacing against the uploaded KiCad footprint file.

Verify footprint geometry

Check remaining parts

List exact mismatches

Thought

flux

Set Manufacturer Name to "Würth Elektronik eiSos GmbH & Co. KG"
Set Part Type to "Capacitor"
Set Datasheet URL to "https://www.we-online.com/components/products/datasheet/890334025045.pdf"
Set Package or Case Code to "Pitch 15 mm, 18.0 x 10.0 x 16.0 mm"
Set Operating Temperature to "-40°C to +105°C"
Set Implementation Details to "- X2 safety class MKP film capacitor - Non-polarized 2-pin through-hole part - Lead pitch 15.0 mm, recommended hole diameter ..."

Thought

flux

Updated to: "X2 safety class MKP film capacitor, 680 nF ±10%, 310 VAC, 15 mm pitch"

Thought

flux

Set ~'s Pin Description to "Non-polarized terminal"
Set ~'s Pin Description to "Non-polarized terminal"

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

Name

Pin #

Type

Part Type

Pin Description

Terminal Order

Passive

Terminal

Non-polarized terminal

Passive

Terminal

Non-polarized terminal

890334025009