Schematic and Layout Assessment

alright I changed the netportals to power net portals, check the schematic
62 days

1:58

Reviewing schematic connections.

Investigating power pin issues.

Accessing knowledge base.

Analyzing the schematic.

Running design review.

Running design review.

Applying component-linking rules.

Summarizing the response.

Good news: your change worked.
What I see now
  • ERC “Missing Power”: cleared (no errors).
  • ERC “Undriven Nets”: cleared.
  • DRC “Airwires”: still 113 unrouted connections.
  • ERC “Shorted Components”: R1 is still shorted (both pins on GND).
Why it cleared
  • Using Power Net Portals marked those rails as Power-type nets, which satisfies ERC. In the netlist they still appear as “Net 1/2/3/5”, which is okay for ERC.
Recommendations
  • If you want the rails to read as VUSB/+3V3/+2V5/+1V1 in the netlist, wire the corresponding Power Net Portal directly onto each rail segment so the name propagates, and avoid mixing standard Net Portals on those rails.
  • Add voltage properties to your power nets for clarity (helps future reviews).
  • Fix R1 by moving one side off GND to its intended net or delete it if unneeded.
  • Continue routing to clear the remaining airwires; then re-run ERC/DRC.
Fix R1 short
Power net naming
Check power portals used
Airwires drilldown
62 days

To get started, talk to Flux or create a New Document.

Documents

    Documents are markdown text files which describe project goals, capture details, or even simulation outputs.

    Assets

    Assets are files uploaded to this project which can be used in various ways.

    Minimal Linux Computer thumbnail
    Welcome to your new project. Imagine what you can build here.

    Properties

    Properties describe core aspects of the project.

    Pricing & Availability

    Distributor

    Qty 1

    Arrow

    $0.89–$1.44

    Digi-Key

    $2.71–$6.20

    LCSC

    $8.15

    Mouser

    $8.24

    TME

    $2.91

    Verical

    $3.03–$5.80

    Controls