Part Information Review and Datasheet Update


I reviewed the part project and updated the missing Datasheet property to the official Samtec series PDF:
Part info review

Table


FieldCurrent project / sourceCheck
ManufacturerSamtecOK
MPNTSW-118-07-G-SOK
DescriptionClassic PCB header strip, 0.100 in / 2.54 mm pitchOK
Part typeConnector / headerOK
Positions18OK
Rows1OK
MountingThrough-hole, vertical terminal stripOK
Contact system0.025 in / 0.64 mm square postOK
Plating code -G10 µin gold in contact area, 3 µin gold on tailOK
Lead style -07Series print decodes correctly; C = 0.230 in / 5.84 mmOK
PackagingBulkInformational
Key specs from the datasheet

Table


SpecValue
Pitch2.54 mm
Current rating4.7 A per powered pin per row
Voltage rating465 VAC
Operating temperature-55 to +125 C for gold plating
HumidityUp to 95%
Durability1000 cycles
Schematic symbol cross-check

Table


ItemFindingResult
Pin count18 terminals presentOK
Pin numberingSequential 01 to 18OK
Symbol styleSingle vertical column with pin 01 at one endOK
Pin typesAll marked PassiveOK for a generic header
Pin descriptionsNo per-pin names/descriptions beyond pin numbersMinor gap
Footprint cross-check

Table


ItemFindingResult
Footprint identityFootprint asset is named for TSW-118-07-G-SOK
Pad count18 padsOK
Pad numbering01 to 18OK
Row styleSingle-row through-holeOK
Family matchConsistent with Samtec TSW single-row headerOK
Mismatches / flags
  • No hard mismatch found in MPN, pin count, row count, symbol numbering, or footprint identity.
  • Minor metadata gap: the symbol has only numeric pin identifiers and no pin descriptions. For this header, that is usually acceptable because the datasheet does not define unique electrical pin names, but if you want richer part metadata you could add descriptions like Pin 1, Pin 2, etc.
  • Not fully verifiable from current tool output: exact drill diameter, annular ring, and pad coordinates versus the Samtec mechanical print. The footprint appears correct by name/count/format, but I could not prove hole size from the indexed layout data alone.
Bottom line
This part project looks largely correct for Samtec TSW-118-07-G-S. The only thing I changed was adding the missing official Datasheet property, and the only issue I’d flag is the lack of optional per-pin descriptions. If you want, I can next do a deeper pin/footprint audit and normalize the terminal metadata for all 18 pins.
Normalize all 18 pins
Deep footprint audit
Review connector properties

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
01
01
Passive
02
02
Passive
03
03
Passive
04
04
Passive
05
05
Passive
06
06
Passive
07
07
Passive
08
08
Passive
09
09
Passive
10
10
Passive
11
11
Passive
12
12
Passive
13
13
Passive
14
14
Passive
15
15
Passive
16
16
Passive
17
17
Passive
18
18
Passive

TSW-118-07-G-S