Part Review and Datasheet Update

flux

Review complete. The Datasheet URL was already set, so I did not replace it; the schematic pin numbers/names match the datasheet: 1=VDD, 2=DOUT, 3=VSS, 4=DIN.
Main issue flagged: the footprint copper pads appear effectively zero-sized/invalid, so the part will not fabricate/solder correctly as-is. I saved the detailed review here: sk6812rgbw-ws-part-review.
A

adrian95

Fix the footprint pad geometry using the SK6812RGBW-WS datasheet land pattern.

flux

I’ll update the 4 copper pads to a datasheet-based SK6812RGBW-WS/5050 land pattern, then re-inspect the footprint geometry.

flux

I found the pads were still at microscopic geometry; I’m applying explicit millimeter rules for the four SK6812RGBW-WS pads now.

flux

Footprint pad geometry has been corrected from microscopic defaults to a 4-pad SK6812RGBW-WS/5050 SMD pattern: VDD/DOUT on the left, DIN/VSS on the right, with 1.5 × 1.8 pad geometry and ±2.2 / ±1.6 placement.
Open item:
  • The datasheet OCR exposed the pin table clearly, but not a detailed manufacturer land-pattern table; I used the standard SK6812RGBW/5050 pad arrangement consistent with the package outline and pin map.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Run a visual footprint/DRC review.
  2. Add pin descriptions/types to the symbol metadata.
  3. Add electrical properties like 3.5–5.5 V, 0.25 W, and 800 kbps data rate.
Run footprint DRC
Fix pin metadata
Add electrical specs
Verify land pattern
Export footprint check
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
VDD
1
Unspecified
DOUT
2
Unspecified
VSS
3
Unspecified
DIN
4
Unspecified

SK6812RGBW-WS