I reviewed the current part project against the datasheet and the project data.
Result
The Datasheet URL is already set, so I did not search the web or update that property. The part-project sync workflow says to only do the web-search/update step when that property is missing or empty
The current part definition has major symbol/footprint mismatches versus the datasheet.
The biggest issue is pin count: the project currently has 14 terminal elements / 14 pads, while the datasheet pinout shows 6 numbered pins total. The sync rules require the project pin count to match the datasheet exactly, using the datasheet as the source of truth
Available part information: project vs datasheetProject metadata now
Table
Field
Current project value
Assessment
Manufacturer Part Number
IGC033S10S1XTMA1
Looks correct
Manufacturer Name
Infineon
Correct
Designator Prefix
Q
Correct for a transistor
Datasheet URL
Present
Present, so no update needed
Description
GaN FETs MV GAN DISCRETES
Too vague / not library-friendly
Package / Case Code
Not set in visible project properties
Missing
Part Type
Not set in visible project properties
Missing
Datasheet-derived part info
From the datasheet, this device is an Infineon CoolGaN transistor, 100 V, G3, in PG-TSON-6 package, with headline values including 100 V drain-source rating, 2.4 mOhm typical (RDS(on)), 76 A continuous drain current, 43 nC output charge, 11 nC total gate charge, and 0 nC reverse recovery charge. The package is explicitly listed as PG-TSON-6
Key specs summary
Table
Spec
Value
Technology
GaN transistor
Drain-source voltage
100 V
Pulsed drain-source voltage
120 V
Continuous drain current
76 A
Pulsed drain current
700 A at 25 C
Typical (RDS(on))
2.4 mOhm
Total gate charge
11 nC typ
Output charge
43 nC typ
Reverse recovery charge
0 nC
Package
PG-TSON-6
Junction temperature
-40 C to +150 C
Storage temperature
-55 C to +150 C
These are the kinds of part-level metadata the sync guidance says should be reflected in project properties and description where applicable
Datasheet pinout
The datasheet pin table shows only these 6 numbered pins:
Table
Pin
Name
Function
1
Gate
Gate
2
Drain
Drain
3
Source
Source
4
Drain
Drain
5
Source
Source
6
Source
Source
The datasheet also notes that the top side exposed silicon substrate is internally connected to source and is not recommended to use as an electrical connection. That does not appear to be presented as an extra numbered electrical pin in the extracted pin table.
Mismatches flagged1) Pin count mismatch
Project: 14 terminals / 14 pads
Datasheet: 6 numbered pins
This is the clearest mismatch. The sync rules explicitly require the symbol pin count to match the datasheet exactly, including any exposed pad only if it is listed as a pin
2) Symbol naming / logical pin mapping mismatch
The current symbol appears to model:
1 gate terminal
2 drain terminals
10 source terminals
That does not match the datasheet, which shows:
1 gate pin
2 drain pins
3 source pins
So the symbol currently over-represents source connections.
3) Pin properties incomplete
All existing terminals currently have:
Pin Type = Unspecified
The sync guidance says pin types should be mapped from the datasheet rather than left unspecified when the function is known
For this part, the sensible mapping would be:
Gate -> Input or Unspecified depending on how you want ERC to behave
Drain / Source -> likely Passive for a discrete transistor part symbol, unless you prefer a stricter custom convention
4) Pin descriptions missing
The current terminals do not include meaningful pin descriptions. The sync workflow recommends short functional descriptions per pin, such as concise labels rather than long copied text
5) Footprint mismatch
The layout currently contains 14 pads, but the package in the datasheet is PG-TSON-6 with a 6-pin package outline and a specific footprint drawing. That strongly suggests the footprint was created from package artwork/stencil features rather than true electrical pins.
6) Package metadata missing
The visible project properties do not currently include a package/case field, even though the datasheet clearly identifies PG-TSON-6. The part-project sync guidance recommends keeping package metadata aligned to the datasheet using the exact package string
Recommended project metadata cleanup
I’d flag these as the most useful property updates:
Table
Property
Recommended value
Part Type
GaN FET or MOSFET
Package or Case Code
PG-TSON-6
Description
100 V CoolGaN transistor, 2.4 mOhm typ RDS(on), 76 A, PG-TSON-6
Operating Temperature
-40 C to +150 C
Max Current
76 A
Bottom line
This part project is not yet datasheet-accurate.
What matches
MPN
Manufacturer
Designator prefix
Datasheet URL present
What does not match
Pin count
Symbol terminal mapping
Footprint pad count
Pin types
Pin descriptions
Package metadata
Project description quality
If you want, I can fix the project next by:
reducing the symbol to the correct 6-pin definition,
Wirelessly connects nets on schematic. Used to organize schematics and separate functional blocks. To wirelessly connect net portals, give them same designator. #portal
General Purpose Thick Film Standard Power
and High-Power Chip Resistor
47 kOhms ±5% 0.125W, 1/8W Chip Resistor 0805 (2012 Metric) Automotive AEC-Q200 Thick Film
Features:
- RMCF – standard power ratings
- RMCP – high power ratings
- Nickel barrier terminations standard
- Power derating from 100% at 70ºC to zero at +155ºC
- RoHS compliant, REACH compliant, and halogen free
- AEC-Q200 compliant