Part Metadata Review and Update


Review complete
I audited the part using a datasheet-first pin/property check workflow and exact property-name matching to avoid duplicate metadata
What I updated Current part metadata Project metadata status

Table


FieldStatusNotes
Manufacturer Part NumberPresentCA3046
Manufacturer NameMissingDatasheet source indicates Intersil lineage for the reviewed sheet
Designator PrefixPresentU
Datasheet URLAddedNow set
Package propertyMissing as project propertyBut project assets indicate DIP14_300_LIT footprint and STEP model
Datasheet summary Key specs from the reviewed CA3046 sheet

Table


ItemValue
Device typeGeneral-purpose NPN transistor array
Internal structure5 NPN transistors total
Special topology1 differential pair + 3 isolated transistors
Package family in reviewed sheet14-lead PDIP and 14-lead SOIC
Absolute max VCEO15 V
Absolute max VCBO20 V
Absolute max collector current50 mA per transistor
Max power dissipation300 mW per transistor
Typical transition frequency550 MHz typ
Max junction temperature150 C
Storage temperature-65 C to 150 C
Symbol cross-check Result

Table


CheckResultNotes
Pin countPassSymbol has 14 terminals, matching the datasheet requirement to match pin count exactly
Pin numberingPassPins 1-14 are present
Functional groupingMostly passThe terminal naming pattern matches the CA3046 structure: Q1/Q2 pair plus Q3/Q4/Q5 isolated devices
Pin descriptionsFlagNo Pin Description properties are populated
Pin typesFlagAll terminals are currently Unspecified
Symbol clarityMinor flagPin 3 is labeled E, which is probably the common emitter node of the differential pair, but the label is a bit ambiguous without a description
Footprint cross-check Result

Table


CheckResultNotes
Package familyLikely passProject assets indicate DIP14_300_LIT, which is consistent with a 14-lead PDIP
Pad countLikely passThe project has 14 corresponding pad/terminal names
Full dimensional verificationIncompleteI can confirm package family/count alignment, but I did not get enough geometric detail from the current layout data to verify every pad dimension and spacing numerically
Pin-level issues I found Main mismatches / gaps

Table


IssueSeverityDetails
Missing Manufacturer NameMediumShould be filled from the chosen datasheet source
Missing package metadata propertyMediumFootprint exists, but no explicit package property is set
All terminal Pin Types are UnspecifiedHighERC usefulness is reduced
No Pin DescriptionsMediumThe symbol is usable, but not self-documenting
No section/group/orientation metadataLowNot required for a simple 14-pin part, but still useful
Overall assessment
  • Good: pin count and high-level symbol topology look consistent with CA3046.
  • Good: footprint/package family appears consistent with 14-pin PDIP.
  • Needs cleanup: terminal metadata is incomplete.
  • Main risk: the symbol is structurally close, but because pin types and descriptions are missing, it is not fully verified/documented yet.
If you want, I can do the next pass and populate:
  • Manufacturer Name
  • Package or Case Code
  • Pin Type for all 14 terminals
  • Pin Description for all 14 terminals
and then give you a stricter pin-by-pin verification table.
Fix all mismatches
Clean up power parts
Check missing footprints

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
Q1C
1
Unspecified
Q1B
2
Unspecified
E
3
Unspecified
Q2B
4
Unspecified
Q2C
5
Unspecified
Q3B
6
Unspecified
Q3E
7
Unspecified
Q3C
8
Unspecified
Q4B
9
Unspecified
Q4E
10
Unspecified
Q4C
11
Unspecified
Q5B
12
Unspecified
Q5E
13
Unspecified
Q5C
14
Unspecified

CA3046