Part Review and Datasheet Validation

Thought for 2 mins 54 sec

I reviewed the current part project for 6160.0015 against its SCHURTER datasheet using a datasheet-first part-audit flow, where the datasheet is treated as the source of truth and pin count/terminal count must match exactly

What I found Datasheet URL

A Datasheet URL is already set in the project.
It points to the official SCHURTER datasheet page: https://www.schurter.com/en/datasheet/2573
Because it was already present, no Datasheet property update was needed.

Current project metadata

From the project:

Manufacturer Part Number: 6160.0015
Manufacturer Name: SCHURTER in project context, while the datasheet names SCHURTER AG
Mount: Screw
Designator Prefix: J
Description: screw-on mounting, M2.5 insert nut, PCB terminal with additional solder terminal, orientation A horizontal

From the datasheet:

Exact MPN: 6160.0015
Manufacturer: SCHURTER AG
Product family: IEC appliance inlet C8
Variant: PCB-terminal short (additional solder terminal), horizontal
Mounting style: front-side panel mount, screw-on, flange with through holes
Electrical poles: 2 terminals, identified as L / N

Key specs from the datasheet Electrical and environmental

Table

Spec	Value
Connector type	IEC appliance inlet C8
Protection class	Class II
IEC rating	2.5 A / 250 VAC / 50 Hz
UL rating	7 A / 125 VAC / 60 Hz
Dielectric strength L-N	> 3 kVAC
Dielectric strength L/N-PE	> 1.5 kVAC
Operating temperature	-25 °C to 70 °C
Front protection	IP20

Mechanical / variant details

Table

Spec	Value
Variant	PCB-terminal short with additional solder terminal
Orientation	A / horizontal
Mounting	Screw-on, flange with through holes
Mounting hole detail	3.2 mm / M3
Panel cutout	about 20.4 mm x 11.6 mm, with radiused corners
Overall width	about 34.3 mm
Body depth	about 20.5 mm

Schematic symbol cross-check Present in the project

The symbol contains exactly 2 terminals, which matches the datasheet terminal count requirement
Existing terminals are:
- 1
- 2

Mismatches / gaps

Table

Item	Datasheet	Project	Status
Terminal count	2	2	OK
Terminal naming	L, N	1, 2	Mismatch
Pin type	Connector terminals	`Unspecified` on both	Mismatch
Pin description	Should reflect line / neutral terminal function	Missing	Mismatch

Assessment

The pin count is correct.
The symbol naming is incomplete: the datasheet identifies the two terminals as L and N, but the project uses generic labels 1 and 2.
Both 1 and 2 currently have Pin Type = Unspecified, which is weak metadata for a library part.
Pin descriptions are missing.

Footprint cross-check Present in the project

The current footprint appears to contain:

Pad 1
Pad 2
silkscreen/fab lines
text fields
a STEP model asset is present

Mismatches / gaps

Table

Item	Datasheet expectation	Project footprint	Status
Electrical pads	2	2	OK
Terminal style	PCB short + additional solder terminal	Not fully verifiable from current pad-only view	Needs review
Mechanical mounting holes	Required for screw-on flange style	Not found in indexed footprint data	Likely mismatch
Flange / panel-mount mechanics	Required by datasheet	Not evident in indexed footprint data	Likely incomplete

Assessment

Electrically, the 2-pad concept is consistent with the 2-pole inlet.
Mechanically, the current footprint looks incomplete for the screw-on flange variant:
- I did not find the expected mounting holes/mechanical hole features in the indexed layout data.
- For this variant, that is the biggest concern.

Overall mismatch summary Confirmed good

MPN matches: 6160.0015
Datasheet URL already exists
Designator prefix J is sensible for a connector/inlet
Terminal count matches datasheet: 2

Flagged issues

Terminal names do not match datasheet
- Datasheet expects L / N
- Project uses 1 / 2
Pin metadata is incomplete
- 1 and 2 are both Unspecified
- No pin descriptions are present
Footprint likely missing mechanical mounting features
- Datasheet indicates screw-on flange mounting with through-hole mechanics
- Current indexed footprint only shows two electrical pads
Project metadata could be more complete
- Manufacturer Name could be normalized to SCHURTER AG
- A more explicit package/type field would help, e.g. connector/inlet family plus mounting variant
- The description is decent, but could be tightened into a clearer library-style summary

Recommended next fixes

Rename 1 and 2 to L and N
Add pin descriptions like:
- Line terminal
- Neutral terminal
Set more appropriate pin metadata for both terminals
Review/rebuild the footprint so it includes the mechanical mounting holes/features for the screw-on flange version
Optionally normalize metadata such as manufacturer name and part description

If you want, I can make the metadata and terminal-name fixes next, and then we can decide whether to rebuild the footprint for the screw-mount mechanical features.

Fix metadata and pins

Rebuild footprint mechanics

Run part review

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

Preview

Name

Pin #

Type

Part Type

Terminal Order

Unspecified

Terminal

Unspecified

Terminal

6160.0015