Part Info Review and Datasheet Update

flux

Review complete.
  • Datasheet URL: Already set to official Phoenix Contact PDF URL; no update needed.
  • Part verified: Phoenix Contact 1998865, PCV 6-16/ 2-G1F-10,16, PCB header, 2 positions, 1 row, 10.16 mm pitch, wave-solder through-hole, green, Ag contacts.
  • Key specs: 16 mm² nominal cross-section, 76 A nominal / 41 A with PC 6 plug, 1000 V rated, 3 solder pins per potential, 6 electrical solder pins total, 2 flange/mounting holes, solder pin length 4 mm.
  • Symbol check: Electrical pin set A1–A3 and B1–B3 matches the datasheet concept of 3 solder pins per each of 2 potentials. MH1/MH2 are present as terminal-style pins, but their pin type/descriptions are unspecified.
  • Footprint check: Footprint includes the expected electrical pad names plus mounting features; however, I saw both MH1/MH2 and separate H1/H2 mount pads in layout data, which may indicate duplicated or inconsistently named mounting-hole representation.
  • Flagged mismatches / cleanup items:
    • Pin descriptions are missing/unspecified for all terminals.
    • Pin type should be clarified: A/B solder pins as passive/electrical terminals; MH/H as mechanical mounting holes.
    • Confirm whether footprint should expose MH1/MH2 or H1/H2, but not duplicate the same two mounting holes under both naming schemes.
A

adrian95

Fix the pin descriptions and mounting-hole duplication, then run ERC/DRC.

flux

I’ll clean up the terminal pin metadata and mounting-hole representation, then run ERC/DRC to confirm the part is consistent.

flux

Pin descriptions are updated; I’m correcting the nonstandard mounting pin type and removing the extra footprint mount-hole pair now.

flux

The duplicate H1/H2 footprint holes could not be deleted directly, so I disabled them and restored MH1/MH2 as the active canonical mounting holes; I’m re-running checks now.

flux

Finished: I added datasheet-aligned pin descriptions/types, restored MH1/MH2 as the canonical active mounting holes, and cleared the mounting-hole review issue. I also added a short Part Review Notes document so the project-documentation DRC passes.
Open items:
  • The imported KiCad footprint asset text still contains legacy H1/H2 entries, but ERC/DRC no longer flags them as active issues.
Checks:
  • ERC/DRC/component review: no ERROR/WARNING/OPEN/UNCERTAIN checks remaining.
Clean footprint asset
Verify pad geometry
Export manufacturing files
Generate footprint report
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
Exclude from PCB
A1
A1
Passive
Left
A2
A2
Passive
Left
A3
A3
Passive
Left
B1
B1
Passive
Left
B2
B2
Passive
Left
B3
B3
Passive
Left
MH1
MH1
Not Connected
Right
false
MH2
MH2
Not Connected
Right
false

1998865