96 Well PCB Design


Yes, use the GPT electrode assignment exactly and keep SMB shells isolated per connector.
Confirmed — I’ll rebuild the layout with GPT’s per-well assignment exactly and use three separate SMB footprints with isolated shells. I’ll remove the row-bar placeholder and 1×3 header, add the per-well cells, then verify the geometry.
I replaced the placeholder electrode field with per-well WE/RE/CE islands and added three separate SMB-style footprints with isolated shell nets. I’m verifying the read-back and updating the project notes now.
Worked for 7 mins 59 sec
Thought for 3 mins 16 sec — Updating todos
4/5 Verify layout geometry and DRC-relevant issues

Remove/disable current row-bar placeholder electrodes and 1x3 header

Add GPT per-well WE/RE/CE electrode geometry on 9 mm pitch

Add three SMB connector footprints with isolated shell pads

Verify layout geometry and DRC-relevant issues

Update project specification with the corrected per-well design

Thought for 20 sec
Looking at the board.
Getting a layout overview.
Getting a schematic overview.
Thought for 46 sec — Fixing visualization issues
Editing layout rules.
Thought for 10 sec — Verifying disabled images
Getting a layout overview.
Thought for 24 sec
Looking at the board.
GPT Proposal Review
Attachment inspected
File: GPT ver.zip
The ZIP contains a KiCad-based architecture draft for a 96-well shared-electrode plate, including:
  • Full 96-well KiCad PCB
  • 4 x 4 coupon KiCad PCB
  • Concept schematic
  • Top-view and single-cell SVG/PNG views
  • Manufacturing notes, risk review, release checklist
  • DXF print masks for Ag/AgCl reference and carbon counter electrodes
  • CSV coordinate table
Key geometry from the GPT proposal
Board
  • Outer dimensions: 127.76 mm x 85.48 mm
  • Thickness: 2.0 mm
  • 4 copper layers: F.Cu, In1.Cu, In2.Cu, B.Cu
  • 5 mm x 5 mm chamfer at one corner
  • 8 x 12 well array
  • 9.00 mm pitch
  • A1 center: 14.38 mm from left edge, 11.24 mm from top edge
  • Wetted opening diameter: 5.46 mm
  • Suggested gasket opening: about 5.60 mm ID
  • Suggested gasket OD: about 7.20 mm
Per-well electrode cell
Each well has three separate local electrodes rather than cross-well row bars:

Table


ElectrodeNetShapePosition relative to well centerApprox. size
WorkingWE_GLOBALcircular diskcenter2.00 mm diameter
ReferenceRE_GLOBALleft crescent/landingx about -1.82 mmabout 1.18 mm x 2.35 mm bounding box
CounterCE_GLOBALright larger landingx about +1.92 mm anchorabout 2.37 mm x 5.12 mm bounding box
Important: this differs from the earlier user idea of a central counter electrode. The GPT proposal uses the central disk as WE, left pad as RE, and right pad as CE.
Connectivity
  • All 96 WE pads are tied to WE_GLOBAL.
  • All 96 RE pads are tied to RE_GLOBAL.
  • All 96 CE pads are tied to CE_GLOBAL.
  • Therefore the plate remains one global parallel electrochemical cell, not 96 independently addressed wells.
Routing approach
  • F.Cu: exposed electrodes and local fanout
  • In1.Cu: WE row buses/trunk
  • B.Cu: RE row buses/trunk
  • In2.Cu: CE row buses/trunk
  • 288 vias total, three per well
  • Suggested via size: 0.60 mm, drill 0.30 mm
  • Via offsets keep vias outside the suggested gasket OD
SMB connector update
The user requested three separate SMB connectors instead of one 3-pin header.
Flux library search did not find a direct SMB 50 ohm female PCB jack part with a usable library footprint. Web research found suitable real SMB PCB jack candidates:

Table


CandidateManufacturerNotes
Molex 731000207MolexSMB Jack, vertical PCB, 50 ohm; official drawing provides a simple 5-hole through-hole pattern
Amphenol 903-415J-51PAmphenol RFSMB PCB through-hole straight jack, 50 ohm; official drawing available
TE/Linx CONSMB002-GTE Connectivity / LinxSMB jack 50 ohm PCB through-hole right angle; drawing/CAD available
Recommended default for this project: Molex 731000207 vertical through-hole SMB jack, because its drawing gives a clean 5-hole footprint.
Molex 731000207 footprint summary
Using center signal hole as origin:

Table


HoleFunctionXYDrill
1Signal center contact0.00 mm0.00 mm1.20 mm
2Shell/shield leg-2.54 mm+2.54 mm1.20 mm
3Shell/shield leg+2.54 mm+2.54 mm1.20 mm
4Shell/shield leg-2.54 mm-2.54 mm1.20 mm
5Shell/shield leg+2.54 mm-2.54 mm1.20 mm
Open design decision: whether the three SMB connector shells should be:
  1. Left isolated from electrode nets and from each other,
  2. Tied together on a shield/chassis net, or
  3. Tied to a controller-side reference/ground strategy later.
For the passive plate, the safest first-pass choice is isolated shell pads per connector unless the controller architecture requires a common shield.
Required changes to the current Flux layout
The current Flux layout should be revised as follows:
  1. Remove or disable the existing long WE/RE row bars.
  2. Remove or disable the existing central CE dots.
  3. Replace the electrode field with 96 repeated local three-electrode cells based on the GPT geometry.
  4. Remove the current 1 x 3 connector J1.
  5. Add three separate SMB footprints near the right edge or top edge:
    • J_WE center pin to WE_GLOBAL
    • J_RE center pin to RE_GLOBAL
    • J_CE center pin to CE_GLOBAL
  6. Keep row/column labels and Bio-Rad dimensions.
  7. Add test pads only if they do not interfere with the SMB connectors and gasket area.
  8. Re-run layout checks after geometry replacement.
Before mutating the layout, confirm two design choices:
  1. Electrode assignment: use GPT geometry exactly, meaning central disk = WE, left pad = RE, right pad = CE.
  2. SMB shell behavior: isolate the shell pads, tie the four shell pads of each connector together only, or tie all connector shells to a common shield net.
  • Attachment inspected

  • Key geometry from the GPT proposal

  • Board

  • Per-well electrode cell

  • Connectivity

  • Routing approach

  • SMB connector update

  • Molex 731000207 footprint summary

  • Required changes to the current Flux layout

  • Recommended next design confirmation