The AI review is correct: this is a terminal-to-pad mapping defect, not a footprint geometry issue.

I filed a part-quality report with the Flux engineering team. No safe local pad override was applied because geometry overrides cannot repair terminal-to-pad identity mapping.

You’re correct—Terminal Order only controls schematic-symbol ordering. I also identified the error in my previous coordinate comparison: the imported KiCad footprint’s Y axis is inverted in Flux’s layout coordinates, so I will re-check the mapping using that transform and correct the report.

You’re correct. My previous conclusion was wrong.

Therefore, no footprint mapping change is required based on this warning. The original AI review appears to have confused terminal order or coordinate orientation with pad numbering.