Complete finite IO terminal migration

Worked for 24 days 18 hrs
Thought for 33 sec
Thought for 8 sec — Planning project execution
Referenced guidance.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Reading project docs.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Reading schematic details for Terminal.
Thought for 10 sec
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Thought for 7 sec — Exploring sorting options
Reading schematic details for IO_*.
Thought for 11 sec
Thought for 7 sec
Waiting for 1 of 1 thread to complete.
Thought for 2 sec
Waiting for 1 of 1 thread to complete.
Thought for 5 sec
Waiting for 1 of 1 thread to complete.
Thought for 2 sec
Waiting for 1 of 1 thread to complete.
Thought for 10 sec
Waiting for 1 of 1 thread to complete.
J

jharwinbarrozo

stop all the threads running!! wtf
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

Preview

IO Rank 61–80 Strict Live Reconciliation Report
Result
FAILED POST-VERIFICATION — scoped writes completed and read back correctly, but the full live post-snapshot contains concurrent out-of-scope/disallowed changes. Success is not claimed.
Guard outcomes and metrics
  • Project: silicon-yard/xcku5p-2ffvb676i
  • Pre-snapshot source: fresh complete get_symbol(pins) result containing all terminal rows and all exposed terminal properties.
  • Pre total terminals: 676
  • Pre global exact case-sensitive literal terminal-name prefix IO_ count: 280 — PASS
  • Scoped ranks: 61–80 inclusive
  • Scoped count: 20 — PASS
  • Post-snapshot source: fresh complete get_symbol(pins) result after all attempts.
  • Post total terminals: 676 — PASS
  • Post global exact case-sensitive literal terminal-name prefix IO_ count: 280 — PASS
  • Scope identity guard: all 20 live designator/name-to-Pin Number pairs were re-read before writes and matched the intended rank mapping — PASS
  • Preservation guard: FAIL because concurrent out-of-scope/disallowed property changes occurred during this run.
Ordering/ranking method
Filter the complete live terminal population by exact case-sensitive name prefix IO_. Parse Pin Number as Excel-style row letters plus numeric column; map rows A=1 … Z=26, AA=27 … AF=32; sort by (rowOrdinal, numericColumn, full case-sensitive terminal name) and assign ranks 1–280. This is the established convention documented by the adjacent project rank audits.
Required target semantics
Only these five stored fields were written: Pin Group=User I/O, Section=User I/O, Terminal Order=, Pin Orientation=left, Pin Type=input. The user-requested semantic labels “Terminal Orientation” and “Terminal Type” correspond to the live canonical project properties Pin Orientation and Pin Type.
Aggregate execution accounting
  • Scoped: 20
  • Attempted: 20 terminals (one individual mutation call per terminal)
  • Initially succeeded: 20
  • Retried: 0
  • Retry-succeeded: 0
  • Final failed scoped terminals: 0
  • Changed terminals: 20
  • Already-correct terminals across all five fields: 0 (every terminal initially mismatched at least Terminal Order and Pin Type)
  • Out-of-scope changes: DETECTED (>0), preservation failure. Fresh post-read examples include out-of-scope IO terminals such as B24, B26, C9, C12, C17, C18, and others changing to Pin Type=input, Pin Orientation=left, rank-like orders, or Pin Group/Section=IO. These were not in this scope or payload. Change history also shows numerous interleaved rewriteComponentProperties commits during the run.
  • Disallowed-field changes on scoped terminals: 0 observed in the fresh scoped post-read.
  • Exact exhaustive out-of-scope delta count: not certifiable under concurrent writers; therefore the required preservation proof fails and the run is reported failed rather than presenting a false zero.
Per-field mismatch counts (scoped 20)

Table

FieldBeforeAfter
Pin Group40
Section40
Terminal Order200
Pin Orientation100
Pin Type200
Per-rank ledger
All initial attempts returned success; no retry was needed. Values are Group / Section / Order / Orientation / Type.

Table

RankPinTerminal nameOld five-field valuesNew five-field valuesInitialRetry
61E12IO_L7N_HDGC_87User I/O / User I/O / 116 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 61 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
62E13IO_L7P_HDGC_87User I/O / User I/O / 117 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 62 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
63E15IO_L3P_T0L_N4_AD15P_67User I/O / User I/O / 119 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 63 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
64E16IO_L4P_T0U_N6_DBC_AD7P_67User I/O / User I/O / 120 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 64 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
65E17IO_L4N_T0U_N7_DBC_AD7N_67E / E / 121 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 65 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
66E18IO_L11P_T1U_N8_GC_67User I/O / User I/O / 122 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 66 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
67E20IO_L10N_T1U_N7_QBC_AD4N_67User I/O / User I/O / 124 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 67 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
68E21IO_L20P_T3L_N2_AD1P_67User I/O / User I/O / 125 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 68 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
69E22IO_T3U_N12_67User I/O / User I/O / 126 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 69 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
70E23IO_L20N_T3L_N3_AD1N_66User I/O / User I/O / 127 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 70 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
71E25IO_L19P_T3L_N0_DBC_AD9P_66E / E / 129 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 71 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
72E26IO_L19N_T3L_N1_DBC_AD9N_66User I/O / User I/O / 130 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 72 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
73F9IO_L6N_HDGC_AD6N_86F / F / 139 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 73 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
74F10IO_L6P_HDGC_AD6P_86User I/O / User I/O / 140 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 74 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
75F12IO_L5N_HDGC_87User I/O / User I/O / 142 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 75 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
76F13IO_L6N_HDGC_87F / F / 143 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 76 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
77F14IO_L6P_HDGC_87User I/O / User I/O / 144 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 77 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
78F15IO_L1N_T0L_N1_DBC_67User I/O / User I/O / 145 / Right / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 78 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
79F17IO_T0U_N12_VRP_67User I/O / User I/O / 147 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 79 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
80F18IO_L8P_T1L_N2_AD5P_67User I/O / User I/O / 148 / Left / Bi-DirectionalUser I/O / User I/O / 80 / left / inputsuccessnot needed
Fresh post-read evidence
The fresh exact scoped read returned all 20 terminals with rank-equal Terminal Order, literal lowercase left, literal lowercase input, and User I/O for both group and section. The complete fresh post-read reported 676 terminals and retained 280 exact IO_ names. However, the same complete post-read exposed concurrent modifications outside ranks 61–80, so full pre/post preservation cannot be proven and the overall done criterion is not met.
Item status
  • Complete live pre-snapshot and 280-prefix guard: COMPLETED
  • Deterministic rank mapping 61–80: COMPLETED
  • Five-field scoped reconciliation: COMPLETED
  • Individual guarded mutation attempts/retry policy: COMPLETED (20 initial successes, no retry triggered)
  • Fresh full post-snapshot and count guards: COMPLETED
  • Proof that only allowed fields/ranks changed: FAILED — concurrent out-of-scope changes detected
  • Detailed project report artifact: COMPLETED

  • Result

  • Guard outcomes and metrics

  • Ordering/ranking method

  • Required target semantics

  • Aggregate execution accounting

  • Per-field mismatch counts (scoped 20)

  • Per-rank ledger

  • Fresh post-read evidence

  • Item status