Part Review Mismatch
Worked for 5 mins 8 sec
Created a project doc
10151114-001TLF Part Review
Date: 2026-07-22 Reviewed the Flux part project for Amphenol ICC/FCI 10151114-001TLF against official Amphenol sources. Checked available me...
Completed the part review and set the official Amphenol datasheet URL on the project. Full findings are in 10151114-001TLF Part Review.
Open items:
- Critical mismatch: official part is 314 contacts/tails, but this project exposes 278 schematic terminals and 282 PCB pads including non-contact pads.
- Pin descriptions are missing.
- Project description should distinguish 5.0 mm stack height from the 7.80 mm mechanical/profile dimension.
Suggested next steps:
- Reconcile missing contacts/tails against Amphenol drawing
10151114.pdf. - Add/document missing terminals and pads.
- Add MXM signal descriptions if the symbol will be used for schematic design.
Fix and verify part
Reconcile missing contacts
Add pin descriptions
Fix project metadata
Run verification
Refine this doc
Ask about this doc
10151114-001TLF Part Review
Date: 2026-07-22
Scope
Reviewed the Flux part project for Amphenol ICC/FCI
10151114-001TLF against official Amphenol sources. Checked available metadata, schematic terminal set, PCB footprint pad set, and pin/terminal descriptions.Sources Used
- Official Amphenol product page: https://www.amphenol-cs.com/product/10151114001tlf.html
- Official Amphenol eBrochure/datasheet set on the project: https://cdn.amphenol-cs.com/media/wysiwyg/files/documentation/datasheet/ssio/ssio_mxm_3_0.pdf
- Official Amphenol drawing: https://cdn.amphenol-cs.com/media/wysiwyg/files/drawing/10151114.pdf
Metadata Found in Project
Table
| Field | Project value / observation |
|---|---|
| Project name | 10151114-001TLF po9t |
| MPN | 10151114-001TLF |
| Manufacturer | Not explicitly set in project-level properties; footprint asset name indicates Amphenol |
| Designator prefix | J from indexed project metadata; terminal components individually use P |
| Description | Project context mentions B Manufacturer Recommendations 7.8 mm Amphenol ICC (FCI) |
| Datasheet URL | Was missing; updated to official Amphenol MXM 3.0 datasheet URL |
| Footprint asset | AMPHENOL_10151114-001TLF.kicad_mod |
| 3D model asset | 10151114-001TLF.step |
| BOM | No BOM parts reported by BOM inspection |
Key Official Specs
Table
| Spec | Official value |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer / series | Amphenol CS / Amphenol ICC MXM 3.0 connector |
| MPN | 10151114-001TLF |
| Lifecycle | Active |
| Type | PCIe MXM 3.0 storage/server connector, right-angle, surface-mount/card-edge socket |
| Contact count | 314 contacts / 314 pin per datasheet and product page |
| Pitch | 0.50 mm |
| Stack height | 5.0 mm |
| Profile/mechanical height note | Drawing includes 7.80 mm profile/side-view dimension; this is not the stated stack height |
| Plating | 30 µin gold contact area for 001 option; gold over nickel contact finish; solder area tin/gold-flash per source context |
| PCB thickness | 1.20 mm per product page |
| Current rating | Product page: 0.5 A; datasheet excerpt: 1.1 A min per pin for 8 power pins and 8 nearest ground pins |
| Data rate | Product page: 16 Gb/s; datasheet family supports PCIe high-speed requirements through Gen 5 except noted variants |
| Contact resistance | 30 mΩ max initially, 10 mΩ max change after environmental exposure |
| Durability | Product page: 60 mating cycles; datasheet excerpt: 50 cycles min |
| Materials | Copper alloy contacts/board locks; high-temperature thermoplastic UL94V-0 housing |
| Reflow note | Drawing notes housing withstands 260 °C peak for 10 s |
| Compliance | Product page indicates RoHS/REACH/low-halogen compliance |
Schematic Symbol Review
Project schematic inspection shows:
278schematic components, all genericTerminalcomponents.- Terminal set consists of
P-numbered terminals plusE1–E4. - The
Pnumbering spansP1throughP281, but skipsP126throughP132. - Effective schematic terminal count:
274P-terminals +4E-terminals =278terminals. - Each terminal has basic properties:
Pin Number,Pin Type: Passive,Part Type: Terminal, andSymbol Pin Position. - No
Pin Descriptionvalues were found on terminals. - No nets are present in the part project, which is acceptable for a standalone part symbol/footprint project.
Schematic Mismatches / Risks
- Critical contact-count mismatch: official part is 314 contacts, but the schematic exposes only 278 terminals. The skipped P126–P132 labels explain only 7 skipped numbers; they do not explain the 36-contact gap versus 314.
- Missing pin descriptions: terminals have no per-pin functional descriptions. Amphenol's connector datasheet/drawing mainly provides mechanical/contact labels; full MXM signal mapping likely requires the MXM/PCIe module specification if signal names are desired.
- Symbol structure is terminal-only: this may be acceptable for a library-part construction workflow, but it does not present a conventional consolidated connector symbol with all contacts grouped under one
Jdesignator.
Footprint Review
Project PCB layout inspection shows:
282PCB pad nodes total.- These appear to include the same
274P pads,4E pads, plusSH1,SH2, and two unnamed mounting/hold-down pads. - Footprint asset is
AMPHENOL_10151114-001TLF.kicad_mod. - Example inspected signal pad dimensions are stored as
0.00035 x 0.002with0.0005pitch increments. Interpreted as meter-scaled values, that corresponds to0.35 mm x 2.00 mmpads and0.50 mmpitch, matching the drawing's 0.35 mm pad width and 0.50 mm pitch. - The drawing calls out the connector as
314 tailsand gives detailed recommended PCB layout dimensions including 82.00 mm/85.00 mm spans, 0.50 mm pitch, 0.35 ±0.03 mm pad width, E pads, locating features, and keepout/mounting features.
Footprint Mismatches / Risks
- Critical pad/contact-count mismatch: even counting mechanical pads, the layout has 282 pads versus the official 314 contacts/tails. If only electrical pads are counted, the gap is 36 contacts.
- Potentially incomplete tail representation: the footprint includes E and shell/mount pads, but the official drawing explicitly notes 314 tails. The project does not account for the missing tails in a visible or documented way.
- Unnamed mount pads: two mounting/hold-down pads are unnamed as
None; these should be intentionally named or documented if they are non-electrical/mechanical pads. - Pad geometry likely OK at a high level: the apparent tiny values look unit-scaled and match official 0.35 mm width / 0.50 mm pitch after conversion, so I would not flag pitch/width solely from raw inspected numbers.
Description / Package Mismatch
The project description/context mentions
7.8 mm, while the official Amphenol product page and datasheet identify this MPN as 5.0 mm stack height. The drawing does show a 7.80 mm mechanical/profile dimension, so this should be clarified: do not describe the part as a 7.8 mm stack-height connector unless a different variant/source proves that.Overall Assessment
The datasheet URL is now set, and the part metadata does point to the correct Amphenol MPN. However, the current schematic and footprint should be treated as not fully verified / likely incomplete because the official part is a 314-contact connector while the Flux part exposes 278 schematic terminals and 282 PCB pads including non-contact pads.
Recommended Fixes
- Reconcile the contact/tail count against Amphenol drawing
10151114.pdfand the relevant MXM 3.0 mechanical/electrical specification. - Add or document the missing 36 contacts/tails, or clearly mark why they are intentionally omitted.
- Add meaningful terminal descriptions or signal names if the MXM pin assignment is required for schematic use.
- Rename/document
Nonemechanical pads and confirm whetherSH1/SH2should be shield/hold-down pads or non-electrical pads. - Update the project description to distinguish
5.0 mm stack heightfrom the7.80 mmmechanical height/profile dimension.
Scope
Sources Used
Metadata Found in Project
Key Official Specs
Schematic Symbol Review
Schematic Mismatches / Risks
Footprint Review
Footprint Mismatches / Risks
Description / Package Mismatch
Overall Assessment
Recommended Fixes
