Source uploaded package inspected: hv-ultrasonic-pulse-amplifier.zip.
Extracted manufacturing data summary:
- Archive type: ODB++ style manufacturing job from Flux.ai
- Units: MM
- ODB version: 8.1
- Board outline: approximately 120.0 mm x 80.0 mm
- X extents: 10.0 .. 130.0 mm
- Y extents: -90.0 .. -10.0 mm
- Copper stackup: 4 signal copper layers
- Total matrix layers: 29
- Components parsed: 50
- Pick-and-place entries parsed: 50
- Component pins with net assignments parsed: 113
- Derived BOM line items: 30
- Named nets found: 30 plus
$NONE$
- Explicit IPC-D-356 file: not found
- ODB++ CAD netlist files found:
steps/pcb/eda/datasteps/pcb/netlists/cadnet/netlist
- Text search for DRC terms found no matches for:
- short
- clearance
- floating copper
- floating
Editable Schematic Reconstruction Status
Implemented in the current Flux project:
- Added 50 schematic components / placeholders from the manufacturing BOM and CAD netlist:
- 27 generic resistors
- 11 generic capacitors
- 4 generic silicon diodes
- 3 terminal blocks
- 1 comparator: LMV331TP-TR
- 1 bridge rectifier: GBU10M
- 1 MOV: TMOV20RP275E
- 1 fuse holder: 64900001039
- 1 transformer: 750341689
- Reconstructed 27 named electrical nets from the ODB++ CAD netlist:
- 5V_CTRL
- AC_L
- AC_L_FUSED
- AC_N
- AGND
- HV_DC_NEG
- HV_DC_POS
- HV_NEG_BUS
- HV_OUT_N
- HV_OUT_P
- HV_POS_BUS
- HV_RET
- HV_SEC_NEG_AC
- HV_SEC_POS_AC
- IN_MINUS
- IN_PLUS
- OC_REF_0V3
- OC_SENSE
- OC_TRIP_N
- VFBN_DIV1
- VFBN_DIV2
- VFBN_DIV3
- VFBP_DIV1
- VFBP_DIV2
- VFBP_DIV3
- VFB_N
- VFB_P
- Marked manufacturing
$NONE$ pins as no-connect where they corresponded to actual component terminals.
Validation Notes
- The schematic summary now reports 50 real design components plus generated net portals and no-connect markers.
- ERC/DRC review reports expected PCB airwires because no editable PCB placement/routing has been reconstructed yet.
- ERC reports two “shorted component” warnings:
- RHV_IN_POS has both pins connected to HV_POS_BUS
- RHV_IN_NEG has both pins connected to HV_NEG_BUS
- Those two warnings were present in the manufacturing netlist reconstruction data: each resistor’s P1 and P2 were assigned to the same net in the ODB++ pin-net table. They should be manually checked against the intended design or original schematic before PCB routing.
Reconstruction Limitations
This is a manufacturing-netlist reconstruction, not a full original design-source recovery. The ODB++ package provided enough data to infer components, values, placements, layers, board size, and CAD net connectivity, but it does not fully preserve original schematic intent, functional grouping, datasheet annotations, ERC intent, or complete manufacturer part selections for generic passives.
Before advancing to PCB layout/routing, the following should be verified:
- Confirm whether RHV_IN_POS and RHV_IN_NEG are intentionally shorted 0-ohm/link-style resistors or whether their extracted net assignments are an ODB++/parsing artifact.
- Verify active component pinouts against datasheets, especially:
- LMV331TP-TR comparator pin mapping
- GBU10M bridge rectifier AC/+/- pin mapping
- 750341689 transformer winding pin mapping
- Assign exact MPNs/packages for generic passives if manufacturing export is required.
- Rebuild layout from the extracted 120 mm x 80 mm, 4-layer ODB++ board data, then run DRC for shorts, clearances, floating copper, and airwires.
Conclusion:
The editable schematic and named network structure have been generated from the manufacturing data. The next phase should be datasheet/pinout verification of active components and ambiguous same-net resistors before PCB layout reconstruction.