15kW Solar Inverter


Proceeding. The stopped run partially committed a substantial MPPT1 stage—four SiC MOSFETs, two 470 µH inductors, voltage/current sensors, protection, and interfaces are present—so I’ll preserve them and finish verification rather than rebuild.
Thought for 14 mins 1 sec
Created a thread
MPPT1 Boost Power Stage
Completed
View Thread
Thought for 8 sec
Awaiting 1 background task
Received notification from "MPPT1 Boost Power Stage" that it finished — picking the work back up.
MPPT1 is complete from the builder’s report. I’m doing an independent final read-back of the power-path inventory and ERC findings before accepting it as the reference channel.
MPPT1 reference stage is complete and independently verified: four IMZA75R040M2H SiC MOSFETs, two 470 µH phases, isolated voltage sensing, dual phase-current sensing, hardware overcurrent protection, gate interfaces, and DNP snubbers. Final schematic inventory is 212 components / 108 nets.
Open items
  • ERC only reports 18 duplicated UCC14141 output-power warnings and the intentional external HV_DC_LINK_PRECHARGE interface.
  • Inductor magnetics, snubbers, and gate resistors require thermal and double-pulse validation.
  • Calculations: MPPT1 Power Stage Design Calculations
Suggested next steps
  1. Add four UCC21750 gate drivers to MPPT1.
  2. Validate MPPT1 by loss/thermal simulation.
  3. Replicate the verified stage to MPPT2 and MPPT3.
Add MPPT1 drivers
Simulate MPPT1 losses
Replicate MPPT stages

MPPT Topology Recommendation
Decision
Recommended per-channel topology: a two-phase interleaved synchronous boost MPPT, not a full four-switch buck-boost, feeding a regulated nominal 450 V DC link.
The selected Canadian Solar arrays operate well below the 430–450 V DC link:
  • 7S2P: 215.6 Vmp at STC and approximately 307.2 V preliminary cold Voc.
  • 6S2P: 184.8 Vmp at STC and approximately 148.8 V estimated Vmp at a 75 °C cell temperature.
Because the PV maximum-power voltage does not cross above the DC link, a buck operating mode is unnecessary. A four-switch buck-boost would add two active switches per phase, isolated gate-drive channels, conduction loss, switching loss, fault paths, control transitions, and cost without improving operation for the selected strings.
If future requirements demand PV operation above the DC-link voltage, retain the same digital-control architecture but redesign the power cell as a two-phase interleaved four-switch non-inverting buck-boost. That is not recommended for the present hardware baseline.
Important Rating Reconciliation
The three stated ratings cannot apply simultaneously over the entire input range:

Text


Maximum input power from the 35 A current limit = Vin × 35 A
Full 6.5 kW requires Vin ≥ 6500 W / 35 A = 185.7 V
Therefore, the required operating envelope is:

Text


Pavailable(Vin) = min(6.5 kW, 35 A × Vin)

Table


PV input voltageMaximum power under 35 A limit
130 V4.55 kW
148.8 V estimated 6S hot Vmp5.21 kW
184.8 V 6S STC Vmp6.47 kW
185.7 V and above6.5 kW capped
215.6 V 7S STC Vmp6.5 kW capped
425 V6.5 kW capped
This derating is acceptable for the selected arrays:
  • The 6S2P array is rated 4.8 kW at STC, below the 35 A envelope at 184.8 V.
  • At the estimated 148.8 V hot operating point, its available irradiance/power will normally be temperature-derated, and the converter can process up to approximately 5.21 kW under the 35 A limit.
  • The 7S2P arrays are 5.6 kW each and remain below the 6.5 kW converter rating.
The specification should describe 6.5 kW maximum power with a 35 A input-current limit, not 6.5 kW at every voltage down to 130 V.
Each MPPT channel should contain two identical boost phases operating 180 degrees apart:

Text


PV+ -> input protection/filter -> L1 -> switching node 1 -> synchronous boost half bridge --+
                                                                                           +--> 450 V DC link
PV+ -> input protection/filter -> L2 -> switching node 2 -> synchronous boost half bridge --+

PV- and DC-link negative share the transformerless power reference.
A synchronous boost phase uses:
  • One low-side controlled switch that stores energy in the inductor.
  • One high-side synchronous switch replacing the boost diode.
  • One dedicated boost inductor.
  • Local high-frequency film/ceramic commutation capacitance.
  • Per-phase current sensing.
  • Isolated high-side/low-side gate drive or an equivalent reinforced-isolation driver arrangement.
Synchronous operation is preferred over a diode boost at this power because it reduces high-current diode conduction loss and provides controlled discharge/reverse-current blocking behavior. Firmware and hardware must prevent reverse energy flow into a disabled or faulted PV string.
Preliminary Electrical Ratings per Channel

Table


ParameterRecommended design value
MPPT tracking range130–425 VDC
Startup threshold≤120 VDC
Normal DC-link target450 VDC nominal
PV absolute maximum500 VDC system limit
Continuous input-current limit35 A
Permitted input short-circuit rating≥45 A
Maximum processed power6.5 kW
Short-duration/clipping-safe input7.0 kW
Full-power minimum input voltage185.7 V
Number of interleaved phases2
Phase displacement180 degrees
Preliminary switching frequency40–60 kHz per phase; use 50 kHz for first-pass magnetics
Target full-load efficiency≥98% power-stage target, subject to verified loss model
The output stage must tolerate inverter/battery-driven DC-link transients. Use a separate bus-level overvoltage shutdown and energy-management strategy rather than assuming the MPPT can always regulate the bus.
Semiconductor Class
Use 750 V-class SiC MOSFETs for both controlled devices in each synchronous boost half bridge.
Rationale:
  • The nominal bus is 450 V.
  • The PV input has a 500 V absolute system limit.
  • 650 V devices provide limited margin for commutation overshoot and abnormal bus events.
  • 750 V devices offer a more appropriate transient margin while retaining substantially lower switching loss than 1200 V devices for this bus class.
Final device selection requires a loss model using:
  • RDS(on) at maximum junction temperature, not only 25 °C.
  • Switching energy at the actual bus voltage, gate resistance, and phase current.
  • Reverse-conduction and dead-time loss.
  • Output-capacitance energy and hard/soft commutation behavior.
  • Short-circuit withstand and gate-driver protection.
  • Package inductance, creepage, thermal interface, and cooling method.
Parallel MOSFETs should not be assumed necessary until the loss/thermal model is complete. A single suitably rated device per switch position may be practical at approximately 17.5 A maximum average phase current.
Preliminary Magnetics
At 450 V output and 50 kHz per phase, with total input current limited to 35 A:
  • Average current per phase: 17.5 A.
  • Target phase ripple: approximately 25%, or 4.38 A peak-to-peak.
  • Preliminary phase peak current: approximately 19.7 A before transient/overload margin.
Using the ideal boost estimate:

Text


D = 1 − Vin / 450
L = Vin × D / (ΔIL × fsw)
The worst first-pass calculated inductance is approximately 514 µH per phase near 216 V input. A provisional 470–560 µH per phase design range is therefore appropriate for detailed magnetic optimization.
Minimum preliminary inductor requirements:
  • Saturation current: at least 25 A at maximum core temperature; higher margin preferred.
  • RMS current: at least 20 A continuous after enclosure-temperature derating.
  • Low enough DCR to keep copper loss and thermal rise acceptable.
  • Core material validated for 50 kHz, DC bias, ripple flux, fringing, and worst-case ambient.
  • Insulation system and winding spacing appropriate for the PV/DC-link voltage and applicable standards.
This is not a final inductor value. Frequency, allowed ripple, core size, copper construction, thermal limits, and control bandwidth must be optimized together.
Input and Output Capacitors
PV-side input capacitance
The PV-side capacitor bank must:
  • Absorb interleaved switching ripple without destabilizing the PV-voltage control loop.
  • Remain small enough that MPPT voltage steps are observable and controllable.
  • Withstand 500 V plus required derating.
  • Use film capacitors for ripple current and life; use small high-voltage ceramics only for local high-frequency decoupling after DC-bias review.
  • Include discharge monitoring and a controlled safe-discharge path.
Each channel should have local high-frequency film capacitance close to the synchronous half bridges. The main 450 V bus capacitor bank is shared at system level and must be sized for inverter transients and 120 Hz ripple; it must not be duplicated blindly on every MPPT board.
Capacitor values require switching-ripple, control-loop, bus-impedance, and lifetime calculations.
Control Architecture
Use a digital real-time controller such as a C2000-class MCU or XMC7000-class MCU. One system controller can coordinate all three MPPT channels if it has sufficient synchronized PWM, ADC, comparator, trip, and CPU resources.
Recommended loops per channel:
  1. Inner phase-current loops or average-current loop with active current balancing.
  2. Outer PV-voltage loop commanding total input current.
  3. MPPT supervisor using incremental conductance or perturb-and-observe at a much slower update rate.
  4. Power/current limiter enforcing P ≤ min(6.5 kW, 35 A × Vin).
  5. DC-link feedforward/limit logic that reduces PV power when the inverter and battery cannot absorb it.
The two phases should have independent current sensing so current imbalance, a saturated inductor, or a failed switch is detectable. Do not rely only on one combined current sensor.
Operating Modes
Startup
  • Verify polarity and insulation state.
  • Measure PV open-circuit voltage.
  • Keep both boost switches disabled while the DC link is pre-charged by the system-level pre-charge path.
  • Enable switching only when PV is above 120 V, the bus is in a controllable range, and no fault is active.
  • Ramp current reference gradually before enabling MPPT perturbations.
Normal MPPT boost
  • Operate both phases 180 degrees apart.
  • Regulate PV voltage to the MPPT reference.
  • Enforce 35 A total input current and 6.5 kW channel-power limits.
  • Apply active current sharing.
Near-pass-through region
At 425 V input and 450 V output, ideal boost duty is approximately 5.6%. Minimum on-time, dead time, current sampling, and pulse-skipping behavior become important. The controller should provide a stable low-duty mode or controlled bypass/pass-through strategy without allowing uncontrolled PV-to-bus current.
A full four-switch buck-boost would make crossover control easier if the input could exceed the bus, but that condition does not occur with the selected strings.
Shutdown and faults
  • Command zero current before disabling PWM when possible.
  • Block reverse bus-to-PV current.
  • Trip gate drives through hardware on phase overcurrent, bus overvoltage, driver fault, and severe current imbalance.
  • Open the channel disconnect/contactor when required by the fault classification.
Protection Requirements
Per channel:
  • 500 V-rated PV disconnect and fusing arrangement.
  • Reverse-polarity detection before switching is enabled.
  • PV input-voltage sensing with independent overvoltage comparator.
  • Hardware bus-overvoltage trip below semiconductor and capacitor limits.
  • Per-phase cycle-by-cycle current limit.
  • Fast short-circuit/gate-driver fault shutdown.
  • Inductor-temperature and switch-temperature monitoring.
  • Input insulation/ground-fault coordination with the system insulation monitor.
  • Arc-fault and rapid-shutdown interfaces as required by the installation.
  • Pre-charge/discharge state verification.
  • Contactor/disconnect feedback and weld detection where contactors are used.
A preliminary current-trip hierarchy could use:
  • 35 A commanded total operating limit.
  • Approximately 40 A controlled overload/soft limit.
  • Hardware phase trip chosen from the final ripple, sensor tolerance, saturation current, and semiconductor safe operating area.
Do not set the hardware trip directly from the 45 A array short-circuit rating; phase-current peak and fault dynamics must be calculated first.
Reference-Design Findings
Infineon REF-9KW2LBOOST
  • Two-channel interleaved two-level boost.
  • 9 kW headline rating, 4.5 kW per channel.
  • 24 kHz switching.
  • 650 V CoolMOS plus 650 V SiC diode.
  • XMC7200 control and hardware current/voltage/temperature protection.
  • Useful architectural reference, but published testing did not validate the full headline power.
Infineon REF-15KW2LBOOST
  • Three-phase interleaved boost with 120-degree phase displacement.
  • 15 kW total, 5 kW per phase.
  • 24 kHz switching.
  • 1200 V IGBT plus 1200 V SiC diode for a much higher 750–850 V bus.
  • Reports approximately 98.7–98.8% semiconductor-stage efficiency at high load.
  • Strong reference for digital MPPT, phase interleaving, current sensing, gate-kill, and fault architecture, but its voltage/device class is higher than required here.
TI TIDM-SOLAR-DCDC / TIDU404
  • Two-phase interleaved boost MPPT.
  • 200–300 V input to 400 V bus in the documented 500 W hardware.
  • 100 kHz switching with nested PV-voltage/current loops and C2000 digital control.
  • Useful control and interleaving reference, but requires complete power-stage, protection, and magnetic scaling.
Infineon four-switch buck-boost optimizer
  • Demonstrates synchronous four-switch buck, boost, and crossover control.
  • Only 400 W, 15–60 V, and 15 A.
  • Valid as a control/topology reference, not as a scalable high-voltage power stage.
Alternative If Buck-Boost Capability Is Mandatory
If an explicit contractual requirement demands 130–425 V input independent of a variable DC link that could fall below the PV voltage, use a two-phase interleaved four-switch non-inverting buck-boost:
  • Two complete four-switch cells, 180 degrees interleaved.
  • Eight 750 V SiC MOSFETs total per MPPT channel.
  • One inductor per cell.
  • Boost mode when PV is below the bus.
  • Buck mode when PV is above the bus.
  • Four-switch transition band around crossover.
This option should be selected only after defining the minimum DC-link voltage. If the bus is always maintained at 430–450 V, the extra buck leg is not justified.
Before a detailed schematic and component selection:
  • Fix nominal/minimum/maximum DC-link voltage, including ride-through and transient limits.
  • Define switching-frequency target from acoustic, magnetic, EMI, and efficiency constraints.
  • Define ambient/coolant temperature and cooling method.
  • Define allowable inductor ripple and MPPT voltage ripple.
  • Define required efficiency and power-density targets.
  • Define bus-capacitor architecture and allowable MPPT contribution to 120 Hz ripple.
  • Decide whether one controller manages all three channels or each channel has an independent controller.
  • Complete semiconductor loss, magnetic loss, capacitor ripple/lifetime, control-loop, and fault-energy simulations.
Final Recommendation
Proceed with a two-phase interleaved synchronous boost MPPT channel using 750 V SiC devices, a 450 V nominal DC link, 50 kHz preliminary switching frequency, and approximately 470–560 µH per-phase inductors. Implement 6.5 kW as a power ceiling with a 35 A input-current ceiling, giving full power only above 185.7 V.
Do not use a full four-switch buck-boost unless the DC link is later allowed to fall below the PV operating voltage or future PV strings can operate above the bus.
  • Decision

  • Important Rating Reconciliation

  • Recommended Power Cell

  • Preliminary Electrical Ratings per Channel

  • Semiconductor Class

  • Preliminary Magnetics

  • Input and Output Capacitors

  • PV-side input capacitance

  • DC-link-side local capacitance

  • Control Architecture

  • Operating Modes

  • Startup

  • Normal MPPT boost

  • Near-pass-through region

  • Shutdown and faults

  • Protection Requirements

  • Reference-Design Findings

  • Infineon REF-9KW2LBOOST

  • Infineon REF-15KW2LBOOST

  • TI TIDM-SOLAR-DCDC / TIDU404

  • Infineon four-switch buck-boost optimizer

  • Alternative If Buck-Boost Capability Is Mandatory

  • Recommended Next Design Inputs

  • Final Recommendation