Designing a Bitcoin Miner
Thought for 37 sec
I checked it.
- There is no ERC result currently available for the
decoupling_capsreview category, so Flux is not reporting a missing-decoupling warning around X1 right now. The decoupling check is the correct ERC category for this kind of issue - In the schematic, X1 has:
VDDtied toVCC_3V3GNDtied toGNDOUTconnected only to IC1CLKI
- The
VCC_3V3net also includes C17 and C18, so there is capacitance on the rail, but it is not obvious from ERC alone that one of those is a dedicated local bypass capacitor specifically for X1.
So the answer is:
- ERC: no missing-decoupling flag reported for X1
- Design clarity: still worth checking whether C17 or C18 is intended to be the oscillator’s local decoupler
If you want, I can next check the oscillator datasheet guidance and tell you whether X1 should have its own dedicated 100 nF cap placed right at the supply pin.
save project
Thought for 33 sec
I can’t save the project for you from chat.
I could not find relevant Flux documentation for a manual project-save feature, so this probably means that action isn’t available here.
Open Flux docs
Search save docs
Ask community
