Key locked decisions: MAX17055ETB+T + BQ25895RTWT + TUSB320LAIRWBR, 1.0 A default charge, 1.5 A only after validation, 2.0 A engineering-only, BQ25895 charge disabled until firmware configures safe settings, and mandatory cell-temperature/USB-C current validation.
Suggested next steps:
Approve these battery-management requirements as the schematic baseline.
Select the exact protected 18650 cell and holder.
Continue Phase 2 with radio/MCU/audio architecture comparison before schematic capture.
Status: Draft for user approval before Phase 2 component selection.
This report covers Phase 1 only. No schematic or PCB layout has been created yet.
Executive Recommendation
Proceed to Phase 2 only under this architecture assumption: Revision A should be a four-node, low-latency, one-hop DECT NR+ intercom prototype with an automatically elected temporary coordinator, not a guaranteed true mesh product.
The Nordic nRF9151 is a credible DECT NR+ radio candidate for the European 1880-1900 MHz allocation, but the current public Nordic DECT NR+ implementation supports FT/PT star networking rather than direct mesh/multi-hop routing. Multi-hop should remain an explicit experiment or future partner-stack option, not a committed Revision A feature.
A dedicated application/audio MCU is recommended for Revision A unless benchmarking proves the nRF9151 application core can simultaneously handle radio control, codec work, mixing, UI, security, and recovery logic with comfortable CPU/RAM margin.
1.5-2 A charge likely needs switch-mode charger and thermal validation.
PCB
Revision A 6-layer impedance-controlled, testable prototype
Feasible and recommended
Avoid blind/buried vias; separate RF, audio, power, digital zones.
Open source
Open-source product intent
Partially constrained
Hardware and application firmware can be open; radio modem firmware and codec licenses may not be fully open.
Architecture Block Diagram
Diagram
DECT NR+ Feasibility Analysis
What is favorable
The European 1880-1900 MHz DECT allocation is a strong fit for a church intercom because it avoids crowded 2.4 GHz WiFi/BLE audio assumptions and is purpose-built for local-area low-latency communications.
Nordic nRF9151 publicly supports DECT NR+ and has published DECT NR+ sensitivity around -105 dBm for beacon/MCS0 and -103 dBm for unicast/MCS1, with up to about 19-21 dBm conducted TX power depending on band/configuration.
Nordic's Hello DECT sample demonstrates IPv6 data over DECT NR+ using FT/PT roles, and the shell/sample tooling supports scanning, association, and network management experimentation.
What is not proven
The current public Nordic stack does not provide a finished four-user intercom, group voice, synchronized low-latency audio, or mesh routing implementation.
Nordic's own DevZone response states that mesh networking is not currently supported in Nordic's implementation. This directly affects the user's preferred decentralized multi-hop experience.
The nRF9151 application processor is 64 MHz Cortex-M33 with 1 MB flash and 256 KB RAM. That may be adequate for radio control and simple firmware, but it is not safe to assume enough headroom for 1 encode + 3 decodes + audio mixing + OLED UI + security + routing.
Recommended Phase 1 position
Use nRF9151 as the DECT NR+ radio candidate.
Treat FT/PT star operation with elected coordinator as the baseline.
Treat true mesh/multi-hop as an experiment, not a committed Revision A capability.
Add a dedicated application/audio MCU in the architecture unless benchmarks prove it unnecessary.
Mesh and Multi-Hop Feasibility Matrix
Table
Requirement
Supported directly by chipset
Supported by current official SDK
Requires custom firmware
Requires custom MAC/networking work
Technically uncertain
Recommended validation experiment
EU 1880-1900 MHz DECT NR+ operation
Yes, subject to band/config
Yes, with correct firmware/regional config
Low
No
Regulatory/country details
Bring up nRF9151 DKs in EU overlay/config and verify legal channel/TX settings.
One FT with multiple PTs
Radio-capable
Yes, Hello DECT / MAC+DLC direction
Medium
Low
Four-node voice load
Run one FT and three PTs, measure latency/jitter/packet loss.
Peer-to-peer with no coordinator
PHY may allow experiments
Not as a direct turnkey user experience
High
Medium to high
High
Test whether two nodes can exchange low-latency payloads without persistent FT role.
Dynamic coordinator election
No automatic product feature
Role support exists, election not turnkey
High
Medium
Medium/high
Implement highest-ID or priority election, kill FT, measure recovery time.
Multi-hop routing
Standard has mesh concepts, chipset not enough by itself
No, Nordic says mesh not currently supported
Very high
Very high or partner stack
High
Try three-node relay at application layer; measure duplicate suppression, loop prevention, and added latency.
Store-and-forward/scheduled relaying
Not direct
No direct support found
Very high
Very high
High
Emulate relay packets with sequence numbers and TTL; measure jitter under two-hop load.
Simultaneous voice streams
RF link likely capable at low bitrates
Data transport exists, voice stack not turnkey
High
Medium
Medium
Send synthetic audio payloads for 1, 2, 3, and 4 talkers at 5/10/20 ms packet periods.
Low-latency group audio
Not direct
No complete sample found
High
Medium/high
High
End-to-end mouth-to-ear test with codec and jitter buffer.
Automatic frequency/interference management
DECT technology supports coexistence mechanisms
SDK has scan/association tools; full behavior must be verified
Medium
Medium
Medium
Interference/channel occupancy test in a real church environment.
Authenticated pairing and encrypted voice/control
Hardware/security primitives likely available
MAC security exists, product pairing is custom
High
Low/medium
Medium
Build four-node trusted-peer provisioning demo and lost-device removal flow.
Fallback Network Architecture
If true mesh audio is not practical with the current Nordic stack, use this fallback:
Each beltpack stores a network ID, device ID, and trusted-peer credentials.
On power-up, each node scans for an existing trusted coordinator/FT.
If no coordinator is found, nodes wait a randomized interval and elect a coordinator deterministically, for example by priority plus device ID.
PT nodes associate with the elected FT and exchange voice/control packets.
If the coordinator disappears, PT nodes stop transmitting voice, continue local UI indication, rescan, and run election again.
If an optional stationary powered relay is later added, it uses the same network identity and a higher coordinator priority, but no unique beltpack hardware redesign is required.
Any future relay packet format must include source ID, stream ID, sequence number, hop count/TTL, and recent-packet cache to prevent duplicate audio and routing loops.
This gives the desired user experience of no permanently required base station while staying honest about current stack limitations.
Audio Bandwidth, Codec, and Latency Budget
Audio target
Mono speech.
16 kHz or 24 kHz sampling.
Speech bandwidth suitable for intercom intelligibility, not music fidelity.
One-hop target below 40 ms where realistically possible.
Multi-hop target below 80 ms where realistically possible.
PTT-gated microphone; acoustic echo cancellation not mandatory.
Firmware-adjustable sidetone is recommended so operators hear a low-level copy of their own microphone while transmitting.
Codec comparison
Table
Codec
Strengths
Risks
Phase 1 recommendation
LC3plus
DECT-aligned, low latency, 2.5/5/10 ms frames, good speech quality at lower bitrates
Best final candidate if licensing and implementation are acceptable.
Opus low delay
Mature, open-source, excellent quality, supports 2.5-60 ms frames
Low-delay CELT mode can be CPU-heavy; SILK speech modes add delay and are not used below 10 ms frames
Benchmark on target MCU; strong alternative if licensing simplicity matters.
ADPCM
Very low CPU, low algorithmic delay, simple to debug, tolerant for prototypes
Higher bitrate, lower quality/noise robustness than LC3plus/Opus
Best Revision A fallback for early radio/audio transport testing.
Uncompressed PCM
Simplest lab payload, no codec CPU, deterministic
16 kHz 16-bit mono is 256 kbps per talker before overhead; poor airtime efficiency
Use only for early lab latency/transport tests.
Preliminary bitrate assumptions
Table
Mode
Payload rate per talker before packet overhead
16 kHz, 16-bit PCM mono
256 kbps
24 kHz, 16-bit PCM mono
384 kbps
IMA ADPCM at 16 kHz, 4 bits/sample
64 kbps
LC3plus / Opus speech target
Approximately 16-48 kbps depending quality/frame settings
One-hop latency budget target
Table
Element
Conservative target
ADC/audio codec buffering
1-3 ms
Audio frame collection
5-10 ms
Codec algorithmic delay and CPU time
5-12 ms
Radio scheduling and packet transfer
5-10 ms, must measure
Jitter buffer
5-10 ms
Mixing/limiting/DAC
1-3 ms
Preliminary one-hop total
22-48 ms
A sub-40 ms one-hop target is plausible only with short frames, tight radio scheduling, low jitter, and measured CPU headroom. A two-hop path likely adds another scheduling/forwarding/jitter interval, so below 80 ms is possible but not assured.
nRF9151 Alone vs Dedicated Application/Audio MCU
nRF9151 application-core constraints
64 MHz Arm Cortex-M33.
1 MB flash and 256 KB RAM.
Radio modem and DECT NR+ firmware on network/modem side.
This is attractive for a compact design, but Phase 1 should not assume it can handle all audio/network/UI/security tasks simultaneously.
Recommended Revision A direction
Use nRF9151 for DECT NR+ radio plus a dedicated application/audio MCU candidate such as nRF5340 or STM32U5. The nRF5340 is especially attractive for early work because it has Nordic/Zephyr ecosystem alignment, 128 MHz Cortex-M33 application core, 512 KB RAM class resources, I2S/PDM/USB, hardware security, and existing audio-development ecosystem experience. STM32U5 remains a valid alternative if more RAM, peripheral flexibility, or non-Nordic independence becomes more important.
Phase 2 should compare nRF5340, STM32U5, STM32H5, and any lower-power audio MCU options using measured codec benchmarks.
Preliminary RF Link Budget
Assumptions
Table
Parameter
Assumption
Notes
Frequency
1.89 GHz
Middle of European 1880-1900 MHz DECT band.
Legal class reference
Up to about 250 mW / 24 dBm nominal or EIRP class depending national wording
Must be checked against ETSI/CEPT/country rules and final antenna gain.
nRF9151 conducted TX power
19-21 dBm
Published Nordic values vary by band/config; use 20 dBm planning value.
Antenna gain
0 dBi planning value
Avoid relying on antenna gain for range; keep EIRP legal.
Feed/connect losses
0.7 dB each end
SMA/U.FL/cable/launch estimate.
Receiver sensitivity
-103 dBm
Conservative unicast/MCS1 value; -105 dBm published for beacon/MCS0.
Body loss allowance
8 dB total
Belt-worn placement can be worse; must test.
Fade margin
20 dB
Outdoor/body-worn reliability planning margin.
Indoor masonry wall loss
8-15 dB per wall
Highly variable; church construction can be worse.
Using TX conducted 20 dBm, TX feed loss 0.7 dB, 0 dBi antennas, RX feed loss 0.7 dB, 8 dB body allowance, and 20 dB fade margin:
Received level before fade/body margin at 400 m = 20 - 0.7 + 0 - 90.0 + 0 - 0.7 = -71.4 dBm.
After 8 dB body allowance and 20 dB fade margin = -99.4 dBm equivalent planning level.
Compared with -103 dBm sensitivity, remaining planning margin is about 3.6 dB.
Interpretation
The 400 m outdoor line-of-sight target is plausible but not guaranteed; it has limited margin under conservative body/fade assumptions.
Indoor 400 m coverage cannot be guaranteed. Two masonry walls at 10-15 dB each can consume 20-30 dB, turning a viable outdoor link into a marginal or failed indoor link.
Multi-hop can improve coverage by replacing one long obstructed path with shorter paths, but only if routing, duplicate suppression, timing, and latency are implemented and measured.
Do not add an RF power amplifier in Revision A. It is not justified unless legal, supported by DECT NR+, compatible with certification, and required after measured link results.
Antenna Arrangement Evaluation
Table
Option
Pros
Cons
Recommendation
Board-mounted SMA connector
Simple, good for lab, direct 50 ohm path
User torque and belt impacts load PCB solder joints; hard to isolate from enclosure stress
Acceptable for bench prototypes only with mechanical bracing.
Reverse-polarity SMA
Can discourage ordinary antennas in some markets
Not legally or technically justified here by default; may confuse sourcing
Do not use unless certification/legal strategy specifically requires it.
Internal U.FL to enclosure-mounted SMA
Best mechanical isolation; replaceable external antenna; enclosure absorbs torque
U.FL has limited mating cycles; pigtail loss and assembly complexity; needs strain relief
Recommended for belt-worn product and likely Revision A if enclosure/mechanics are included.
Direct board-edge SMA
Good RF path, robust if edge mounted with mounting legs and enclosure support
Still transfers force into PCB; board outline/enclosure constraints matter
Good Revision A compromise if mechanically reinforced and kept away from body/battery.
Recommended direction: enclosure-mounted bulkhead SMA connected by short internal coax/U.FL or equivalent board RF connector, with strain relief, pi matching network at the RF launch, conducted-test option, and defined antenna keepout. For a bare development PCB, a reinforced edge-launch SMA plus RF test connector is acceptable.
Do not claim the antenna is tuned or certified until VNA tuning, radiated testing, body-worn tests, and regulatory review are complete.
Preliminary Power Budget
Battery assumption
Protected 18650 Li-ion cell: 3000 mAh nominal, 3.6 V nominal, about 10.8 Wh nameplate.
Usable system energy after discharge limits and regulator losses: roughly 8.5-9.5 Wh for planning.
Load assumptions to validate
Table
Subsystem
Mostly listening
Normal mixed use
Coordinator/relay
Worst continuous TX/RX
Notes
nRF9151 radio/modem
120-200 mW
200-450 mW
450-800 mW
800-1100 mW
Must measure with chosen MCS, TX power, and duty cycle.
Application/audio MCU
40-100 mW
80-180 mW
150-300 mW
200-400 mW
Codec count dominates.
Audio codec/amp/mic bias
25-80 mW
40-120 mW
40-150 mW
80-200 mW
Earpiece impedance and output level matter.
OLED and controls
20-80 mW
20-80 mW
20-80 mW
20-80 mW
OLED content/brightness must be managed.
Regulators/monitoring overhead
30-80 mW
50-120 mW
80-160 mW
100-220 mW
Depends on topology and load.
Total planning power
235-540 mW
390-950 mW
740-1490 mW
1200-2000 mW
Wide range until measured.
Runtime estimate
Using 9.0 Wh usable energy:
Table
Use case
Planning power
Estimated runtime
Comment
Mostly listening
0.35-0.55 W
16-26 h
Likely exceeds target if radio receive duty and OLED power are controlled.
Normal mixed use
0.65-0.95 W
9.5-14 h
Meets preferred 10-12 h only if codec/radio duty are efficient.
Continuous relay/coordinator
1.0-1.5 W
6-9 h
Meets minimum but may miss 10-12 h. Coordinator rotation may help.
Worst simultaneous TX/RX
1.5-2.0 W
4.5-6 h
Borderline; avoid defining this as normal operating condition.
The 6 h requirement is plausible. The 10-12 h target is plausible for normal use but not guaranteed for a heavily loaded coordinator/relay unless power measurements are favorable.
USB-C and Charging Feasibility
A basic USB-C sink can use Rd pull-downs on CC1/CC2, but a device drawing more than default current must detect source current advertisement or use a controller.
5 V USB-C without PD is enough for Revision A if the charger observes advertised current limits and total system load.
9 V USB-PD does not automatically help a single-cell design. With a linear charger it worsens heat; with a switch-mode charger it may reduce cable current but adds complexity.
For 1.5-2 A single-cell charging, a switch-mode charger/power-path controller is strongly preferred.
Thermal example: a linear charger at 5 V input, 3.6 V battery, 1.5 A dissipates about (5.0 - 3.6) * 1.5 = 2.1 W, before system-load effects. That is too hot for a small beltpack without severe thermal foldback.
The selected charger must include NTC/JEITA behavior or equivalent thermal safety, input current limit, power-path/load sharing, charger state reporting, and no unsafe USB backfeed.
Headset and Kenwood K1 Feasibility
Common practical K1-style wiring varies, but a conservative starting point from public references is:
Table
Connector
Contact
Typical function
2.5 mm TRS
Tip
Speaker / earpiece audio
2.5 mm TRS
Ring
Accessory/data/variant-dependent
2.5 mm TRS
Sleeve
Ground/common
3.5 mm TRS
Tip
Bias/supply variant-dependent
3.5 mm TRS
Ring
Microphone audio
3.5 mm TRS
Sleeve
PTT, often short to ground
Revision A must not hard-code one accessory assumption. Include ESD protection, RF filtering, microphone input protection, speaker output protection, PTT detect, mic-bias filtering, and 0 ohm/solder-jumper options for variants. Add clearly labeled MIC, PTT, EARPIECE_OUT, GND, and MIC_BIAS test points.
Production warning: the exact final headset/accessory must be measured before production. K1-compatible accessories are not electrically identical.
Major Technical Risks
Table
Risk
Severity
Why it matters
Mitigation
Nordic stack mesh support absent
High
Multi-hop is a major requested feature but not directly supported
Baseline elected-coordinator star architecture; run explicit relay experiments; consider partner stacks.
Coordinator failure recovery time
High
Intercom must recover automatically
Implement election experiment early and measure audio outage.
Group voice latency/jitter
High
Church operators need natural timing
Synthetic payload tests before hardware audio; short frames; small jitter buffer; measure worst case.
Codec CPU/RAM load
High
nRF9151 may be too small for all processing
Benchmark 1 encode + 3 decodes; use dedicated MCU if margin is poor.
Codec licensing/open-source compatibility
Medium/high
Open-source product may conflict with codec/IP terms
Compare LC3plus, Opus, ADPCM licensing in Phase 2.
RF body loss and antenna detuning
High
Belt-worn RF range can collapse
External antenna, keepout, VNA tuning, body-worn range tests.
Indoor range expectations
High
400 m indoor is unrealistic
State as target only; test in real venue; allow optional relay later.
USB-C/charger thermal safety
High
1.5-2 A charge can overheat
Switch-mode charger, NTC, current limit, thermal testing.
K1 headset pinout variations
Medium/high
Wrong wiring can damage audio/produce no PTT
Jumpers, protection, test points, accessory validation.
Audio noise/RF ingress
Medium/high
Earpiece intelligibility and RF immunity are critical
Physical zoning, filtering, analog LDO, shielding/grounding review.
Regulatory certification
High
DECT radio and replaceable antenna require compliance work